It was 24 years ago when the U.S. Supreme
Court ordered stand-alone displays of the Ten Commandments taken down from
public school classrooms across the nation. Now the court is being asked to
revisit the issue by the same state where the landmark Stone v. Graham ruling
originated -- Kentucky. On June 22, Liberty Counsel, a public interest law
firm dedicated to defending religious freedom, urged the U.S. Supreme Court
to hear the Kentucky case in order to resolve a conflict among the federal
circuit courts over the question of the constitutionality of public displays
of the Ten Commandments.
At issue are Harlan County schools and McCreary and Pulaski County
courthouses which displayed the Ten Commandments along with other historical
documents until they were ordered down by a federal judge in 2001. In a
related case, U.S. District Judge Karl Forester ruled on Jan. 22, 2003 that
Mercer County’s Ten Commandments display "clearly has a legitimate secular
purpose of. . . acknowledging the historical influence of the Commandments on
the development of this country's laws.”
However, 12 months later, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals banned
nearly identical Ten Commandment displays from Harlan, McCreary and Pulaski
counties -- a clear conflict with four other federal circuit courts, which
have upheld similar displays like the one in Mercer County. The court charged
that posting the Ten Commandments on public property constitutes an
establishment of
religion.
Mat Staver, President of Liberty Counsel,
has been anxious to take this case to the nation’s highest court. “The lower
federal courts are in a hopeless morass of confusion on the issue of the
constitutionality of the Ten Commandments,” Staver said. “We are hopeful
that the Supreme Court will accept this case and uphold the constitutionality
of these
displays.”
There have been 24 legal challenges to public displays of the Ten
Commandments since 1999. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear similar Ten
Commandment cases four times since 2001 but the prospects of the court taking
this case are better since there is a clear conflict in the federal
courts.
“It is time for the United States Supreme Court to uphold the
constitutionality of a display containing the Ten Commandments,” Staver
said. “Our history is replete with references to the Ten Commandments. There
is no question that the Ten Commandments played a significant role in the
origin of American law and government and that they may be constitutionally
displayed for their historical significance.”