Louisville’s Metro Government got a shot in the arm on June 7 from the U.S.
Supreme Court when it ruled that communities can strictly regulate sexually
oriented businesses (SOB’s). The court upheld a Littleton, Colorado
ordinance similar to Louisville's new law, which mandates licenses, bans
total nudity and requires dancers to stay at least 6 feet from customers.
The ordinance also bans the sale of alcohol where there are live performances
and requires viewing booths and peep shows to be open to monitoring at all
times.
Jefferson County Attorney Irv Maze was pleased with the ruling. "It's
going to be awful hard to ignore," Maze said. He hopes the ruling will pave
the way for Louisville to begin enforcing its adult-entertainment ordinance,
which has been on hold since Jefferson Circuit Judge Steven temporarily
blocked the law from taking effect in March. Since then, SOB’s have
proliferated throughout the city with many locating near churches and
residential areas—a blatant disregard to basic zoning
laws.
In his temporary restraining order, Judge Ryan didn't elaborate on why he was
blocking the law. He said only that the SOB’s would suffer “irreparable
harm” if the law was enforced and that there is a question of the
constitutionality of the ordinance.
Frank Mascagni, a lawyer representing P.T.'s Showclub and Déjà Vu,
both strip clubs, said he was mostly concerned about the tone the Supreme
Court case sets. "What scares me is this conservative court allowing
government to continue placing regulations on lawful businesses," he
said.
However, court watchers say the Supreme Court has been anything but
conservative, noting that the court blocked the Child Online Protection Act (COPA)
on June 29. Passed overwhelmingly by Congress in 1998, COPA was
designed to protect children from hard-core pornography readily available
over the Internet.